<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Camera Reviews &#187; $200 &#8211; $300</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/category/200-300/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com</link>
	<description>Get-Reviews.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:58:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pentax Optio S10 Camera Review</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/pentax-optio-s10-camera-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/pentax-optio-s10-camera-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>info</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$200 - $300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/pentax-optio-s10-camera-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the no-frills Optio S10, Pentax bucks the trend of loading up point-and-shoot cameras with neat-sounding but dubiously useful features&#8211;OK, so I&#8217;m not a big face-detection fan&#8211;and sticking true to its photographic roots by including some very useful features that we wish we&#8217;d see more often. 
A basic budget ultracompact, the 10-megapixel S10 incorporates an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/pentax-optio-s10-camera-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus FE-250 Camera Review</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/olympus-fe-250-camera-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/olympus-fe-250-camera-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 03:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>info</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$200 - $300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/olympus-fe-250-camera-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes you just don&#8217;t want to agonize over whether you should choose the soup or the salad, the Coke or the Pepsi, the PC or the Mac. Olympus realizes just how hard choices can be, which is why it&#8217;s made the FE series of digital cameras. They&#8217;re simple, direct, and require almost no choices besides [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/olympus-fe-250-camera-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon PowerShot SD1000 Camera Review</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/canon-powershot-sd1000-camera-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/canon-powershot-sd1000-camera-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>info</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$200 - $300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/canon-powershot-sd1000-camera-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year marked the 10th anniversary of Canon&#8217;s Elph cameras. The line started with a film camera, though the company&#8217;s SD line of digital compacts still carries the Digital Elph moniker. Despite its four-digit number, Canon positions the PowerShot SD1000 as a replacement for last year&#8217;s SD600, which also puts it below the new SD750 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/canon-powershot-sd1000-camera-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus FE-240 Digital Camera Review</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/olympus-fe-240-digital-camera-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/olympus-fe-240-digital-camera-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 22:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>info</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$200 - $300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/olympus-fe-240-digital-camera-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes you just don&#8217;t want to agonize over whether you should choose the soup or the salad; the Coke or the Pepsi; the PC or the Mac. Olympus realizes just how hard some choices can be, which is why it&#8217;s made the FE series of digital cameras. They&#8217;re simple and direct, and they require almost [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/olympus-fe-240-digital-camera-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus Stylus 760 Digital Camera Review</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/olympus-stylus-760-digital-camera-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/olympus-stylus-760-digital-camera-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>info</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$200 - $300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/olympus-stylus-760-digital-camera-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We suspect Olympus must have put Hermes in charge of the Stylus digital camera releases since they came to market so quickly. The Stylus 740 and 750 are barely six months old, and the Stylus 710 was only about that old when they arrived. With an accelerated release schedule like that, there&#8217;s not a lot [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/olympus-stylus-760-digital-camera-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung NV10 Camera Review</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/samsung-nv10-camera-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/samsung-nv10-camera-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 07:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>info</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$200 - $300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/samsung-nv10-camera-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the risk of sounding like Oprah, I believe digital cameras need to be both smart and sensitive. This is particularly true of ultracompact models, which often eliminate buttons and dials in order to keep the device as small as possible. 
A digital camera needs both to perform well and to offer excellent features. It [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/samsung-nv10-camera-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kodak EasyShare C875 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>info</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$200 - $300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kodak&#8217;s 8-megapixel EasyShare C875 is by no means your average point-and-shoot. This talented camera has a ton of scene modes—21, to be exact. But that&#8217;s not what captured my attention. What piqued my interest is the EasyShare&#8217;s &#8220;smart&#8221; auto mode. In essence, the C875 has the ability to &#8220;guess&#8221; which scene mode you may want [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon PowerShot SD430 Digital Elph Wireless Review</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/canon-powershot-sd430-digital-elph-wireless-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/canon-powershot-sd430-digital-elph-wireless-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 05:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>info</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$200 - $300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/canon-powershot-sd430-digital-elph-wireless-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pricey Canon PowerShot SD430 Digital Elph Wireless ($499.99 list) is the latest addition to the growing wireless point-and-shoot category. It joins the Kodak EasyShare One and the Nikon Coolpix P1 and P2. Like those models, the 5.0-megapixel SD430 lets you connect wirelessly (using 802.11b) to a computer, network, or printer. Overall, this compact camera [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/canon-powershot-sd430-digital-elph-wireless-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kodak EasyShare V705 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/kodak-easyshare-v705-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/kodak-easyshare-v705-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 04:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>info</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$200 - $300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/kodak-easyshare-v705-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kodak&#8217;s EasyShare V705, the follow-up to its highly innovative, decently performing dual-lens/dual-sensor EasyShare V570 ultracompact digital camera, is not going to set the world on fire. Though it&#8217;s true that the new 7.1-megapixel V705 is now available in three colors (pink, black, or silver), Kodak didn&#8217;t otherwise deviate much from the original design. Worse, because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/kodak-easyshare-v705-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX50K Review</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx50k-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx50k-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>info</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$200 - $300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx50k-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not easy being a 7-megapixel snapshot camera. You have to be fast, cute, cheap, smart, and talented just to get noticed. If you&#8217;re lucky, your company will give you a clear spot in the lineup with your siblings; if not, you&#8217;ve got to duke it out with a cheaper version of yourself. By these [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cameras.get-reviews.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx50k-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.253 seconds -->
